Governor Mohammed Umaru Bago of Niger State has ignited a nationwide conversation on the future of governance in Nigeria following his bold advocacy for a single-term tenure for governors and the president. Speaking during the swearing-in of newly appointed commissioners, local government chairmen, and other officials, the governor openly admitted that fear of re-election often discourages leaders from taking decisive actions that could benefit the people.
According to him, the pressure to secure a second term creates a governance environment driven more by political survival than by public interest. He noted that difficult but necessary decisions are frequently avoided because they could offend influential groups whose support is crucial during elections.
How Second-Term Ambitions Undermine Development
Governor Bago explained that many incumbents, particularly in their first term, are constrained from enforcing discipline or implementing reforms because of the political consequences such actions may attract. He cited instances where individuals who failed examinations or deserved sanctions could not be held accountable due to political considerations tied to re-election plans.
In his view, a single, non-renewable term would free leaders from these distractions and allow them to focus fully on governance from the first day in office. He argued that such a system would encourage courage, discipline, and long-term planning, rather than short-term political calculations.
Growing Public Support for Constitutional Reform
The governor’s remarks have resonated widely across the country, with many Nigerians describing his position as honest and selfless. Observers note that while the idea of a single tenure is not new—having featured in past constitutional discussions—it is significant that a serving first-term governor has openly acknowledged the system’s weaknesses while still in office.
Calls are now growing for constitutional amendments to reflect this proposal, with supporters arguing that Nigeria’s democracy must evolve to prioritise effective leadership over endless election cycles.
Ending Corruption and Waste Linked to Re-election Politics
Supporters of the proposal argue that second-term ambitions fuel corruption and waste. They contend that public funds meant for development are often diverted into political war chests, patronage networks, and campaigns aimed at securing re-election.
Under a single-term system, leaders would have no incentive to stockpile resources for electoral battles. Instead, they would be judged solely on performance, legacy, and service to the people. Proponents believe this would restore integrity to public office and reduce the monetisation of politics.
Legal, Human Rights, and Civil Society Perspectives
Legal experts and civil society voices have largely welcomed the proposal, describing it as an opportunity to rebalance Nigeria’s governance framework. They argue that a non-renewable tenure could empower leaders to pursue bold reforms, invest in long-term projects, and act in the genuine interest of citizens without fear or favour.
However, many also caution that tenure reform alone is not enough. They stress the importance of strong institutions—independent legislatures, empowered anti-corruption agencies, vigilant civil society, and a courageous judiciary—to ensure accountability. Without these safeguards, even a single-term executive could abuse power.
Balancing Focus with Accountability
Some analysts warn that a single-term system could create “lame-duck” leaders who may become complacent or reckless without the prospect of re-election. Others argue that major infrastructure and policy reforms often require continuity beyond one term.
Despite these concerns, many agree that Nigeria’s current political culture—where governance slows after the first year as re-election campaigns begin—demands serious rethinking. Strengthening institutions alongside tenure reform is seen as the most balanced approach.
A Call for Purposeful and Courageous Leadership
Governor Bago’s remarks have ultimately been described as a wake-up call. They highlight the moral responsibility of leadership and the need for a system that allows leaders to govern with clarity, courage, and conscience.
For many Nigerians, the debate goes beyond tenure length. It is about restoring the soul of governance, placing service above ambition, people above power, and the common good above political longevity.
