A dramatic scene unfolded at the National Assembly on Tuesday when security personnel barred Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan from entering the complex. This incident occurred as the senator sought to resume her legislative duties following a court ruling that mandated her reinstatement after a six-month suspension.
Senator Natasha, representing Kogi Central, had been suspended by the Senate due to various controversies. However, she recently received a court ruling that ordered her reinstatement, asserting her right to return to the Senate. In anticipation of this decision, she announced her intention to resume her duties, stating her readiness to fulfill her role as a legislator.
As Senator Natasha arrived at the National Assembly in a black vehicle, she was accompanied by a convoy that included notable supporters, such as activist Aisha Yesufu. Upon reaching the entrance, security officials promptly denied her access, citing her ongoing suspension as the reason for their actions.
The standoff quickly drew attention from her supporters, who gathered at the entrance, questioning the enforcement of the court’s directive. They expressed outrage at the apparent disregard for the legal ruling that favored Natasha’s return, highlighting the tension between the legislative authority and the judiciary.
Supporters and observers were vocal about the situation, with many questioning the legitimacy of the Senate’s actions against a court order. Dr. Yunusa Tanko, the National Coordinator of the Obidient Movement Worldwide, reaffirmed loyalty to Natasha and criticized the Senate’s refusal to recognize the court’s ruling. He stated, “We stand solidly behind His Excellency, Peter Obi. Wherever he goes, that’s where we are going.”
The refusal of security to allow Natasha entry raises significant questions about the intersection of political power, legal authority, and individual rights within Nigeria’s legislative framework. As the situation unfolds, it remains to be seen how the Senate will respond to the public outcry and the implications of ignoring a judicial ruling.
